Publications
Forthcoming
| 21. | ‘How and How Not to Take on Brueckner’s Sceptic.’ The Philosophical Quarterly. (link) |
| 20. | ‘In Defense of the Rational Credibility Account: a Reply to Casalegno.’ (with I. Douven). Dialectica. |
| 19. | ‘Proper Bootstrapping.’ (with I. Douven). Synthese. |
| 18. | ‘Tegen Scepticisme over de Waarde van Kennis.’ Tijdschrift voor Filosofie. |
| 17. | ‘A Practical Explication of the Knowledge Rule of Informative Speech Acts.’ European Journal of Philosophy. (link) |
| 16. | ‘Extended Cognition and Robust Virtue Epistemology.’ Erkenntnis. (link) |
2012
| 15. | ‘Do “Contextualist Cases” Support Contextualism?’ Erkenntnis 76, 115-20. (link) |
2011
| 14. | ‘Truth Approximation, Social Epistemology, and Opinion Dynamics.’ (with I. Douven). Erkenntnis 75, 271-83. (link) |
| 13. | ‘Not Without Justification.’ Dialectica 65, 581-95. (link) |
| 12. | ‘What’s the Point of “Knowledge” Anyway?’ Episteme 8, 53-66. (link) |
| 11. | ‘A Problem for Contrastivist Accounts of Knowledge.’ Philosophical Studies 152, 287-92. (link) |
| 10. | ‘Sustaining a Rational Disagreement.’ (with I. Douven). DeRegt, H. et. al. eds. EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Dordrecht: Springer, 101-110. |
| 9. | ‘In Defence of Virtue Epistemology.’ Synthese 179, 409-33. (link) |
2010
| 8. | ‘Second-order Knowledge.’ (with N. Pedersen). Bernecker, S. and Pritchard, D. eds. The Routledge Companion to Epistemology. London: Routledge, 586-96. (link) |
2009
| 7. | ‘Knowledge and Safety.’ Journal of Philosophical Research 34, 21-31. (link) |
| 6. | ‘Pritchard on Knowledge, Safety, and Cognitive Achievements.’ Journal of Philosophical Research 34, 51-53. (link) |
| 5. | ‘Two Deflationary Approaches to Fitch-Style Reasoning.’ (with D. Pritchard). Salerno, J. ed. New Essays on the Knowability Paradox. Oxford: OUP, 324-38. (link) |
| 4. | ‘Pritchard on Virtue Epistemology.’ International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17, 583-87. (link) |
| 3. | ‘Learning from Words: Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. By Jennifer Lackey.’ The Philosophical Quarterly 59, 748-50. (link) |
| 2. | ‘Standards zur Bewertung von Architektur: Ein Funktionsbasierter Ansatz.’ Kelp, C. & Zamp Kelp, G. Eine Suche nach dem vibrierenden Nerv unserer Zeit. Berlin: UdK Buchshop. |
2008
| 1. | ‘Classical Invariantism and the Puzzle of Fallibilism.’ The Southern Journal of Philosophy 46, 221-44. (link) |